Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Technology, Finance, Business & Education News in HindiTechnology, Finance, Business & Education News in Hindi

Politics

Mekedatu Balancing Reservoir Meant Entirely for Tamil Nadu Except Drinking Needs: Karnataka Deputy CM D.K. Shivakumar

Source Deccan Herald

BENGALURU — Reiterating Karnataka’s stance on the contentious Mekedatu project, Deputy Chief Minister and Water Resources Minister D.K. Shivakumar stated that the proposed reservoir is designed primarily to benefit lower riparian states, with Karnataka retaining only a minor fraction strictly for Bengaluru’s drinking water needs.

Speaking on the dispute, Shivakumar emphasized that aside from roughly 4 to 5 thousand million cubic feet (TMC) required for drinking water in Bengaluru and surrounding regions, the entirety of the water stored in the Mekedatu balancing reservoir would ultimately flow to Tamil Nadu.

Shivakumar noted that he had placed this commitment directly on record before Union Home Minister Amit Shah, stressing Karnataka’s willingness to build and manage the balancing reservoir without depriving Tamil Nadu of its mandated share under the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal and Supreme Court awards.

Key Highlights of the Statement:

Drinking Water Focus: Karnataka’s direct withdrawal from the project is restricted strictly to meeting the drinking water requirements of Bengaluru and adjacent areas.

Storage for Distress Years: The Deputy Chief Minister highlighted that the Mekedatu dam is planned as a balancing reservoir to hold surplus water during heavy monsoon seasons, ensuring regulated and uninterrupted releases to Tamil Nadu during lean or drought periods.

Assurance to the Centre: The stance was reiterated during discussions with central leadership, underscoring that Karnataka does not intend to use the stored water for expanded irrigation in the Cauvery basin.

The long-standing Mekedatu balancing reservoir and drinking water project, proposed across the Cauvery River in Kanakapura taluk of Ramanagara district, remains a point of contention between Karnataka and Tamil Nadu. While Karnataka maintains that the project resolves water-sharing challenges during distress years, Tamil Nadu has consistently opposed the construction, citing concerns over water security and river ecology.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

World

Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora.

Business

Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem eum fugiat.

Politics

Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem eum.

Finance

Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora.

Copyright © 2020 ZoxPress Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.