Source Live law
In a significant development concerning India’s education policy, the Supreme Court of India has sought responses from the Union government, the National Council of Educational Research and Training, and the Central Board of Secondary Education on a petition challenging the implementation of the three-language formula for Class 9 students.
The plea, filed by concerned stakeholders, questions the constitutional validity and practical implications of mandating three languages at the secondary school level. The petitioners argue that the policy places an undue academic burden on students and may infringe upon their right to choose subjects based on aptitude and regional preferences.
A bench of the apex court issued notices to the respondents, asking them to clarify the rationale behind enforcing the three-language system and whether adequate consultations were conducted before its rollout. The court has also indicated that it will examine whether the policy aligns with constitutional provisions related to equality and education.
The three-language formula, which has long been a part of India’s educational framework, was re-emphasized under recent curriculum guidelines. It typically requires students to study three languages, including Hindi, English, and a regional or foreign language. However, its implementation has often sparked debate, particularly in non-Hindi-speaking states and among educators who question its feasibility.
During the preliminary hearing, the court acknowledged the sensitivity of the issue, noting that language policy in education intersects with cultural identity, federal principles, and academic flexibility. It emphasized the need for a balanced approach that considers both national integration and regional diversity.
The matter is expected to be taken up for further hearing after the respondents submit their replies. The outcome could have far-reaching implications for school curricula and language education policies across the country.
